![]() Child actors are often boring through no fault of their own. Renner is awesome and I do like Rose Byrne, but I loved the characters of the original way more. 28 days later is one of my favorite films ever and it’s often times hard for sequels to measure up to great predecessors. 28 Weeks Later R 2007, Horror/Mystery & thriller, 1h 40m 72 Tomatometer 198 Reviews 66 Audience Score 250,000+ Ratings What to know critics consensus While 28 Weeks Later lacks the humanism. It is set after the events of the first film, depicting the efforts of NATO military forces to salvage a safe zone in London, the consequence of. The sequel to the 2002 film 28 Days Later, it stars Robert Carlyle, Rose Byrne, Jeremy Renner, Harold Perrineau, Catherine McCormack, Mackintosh Muggleton, Imogen Poots and Idris Elba. The sequel also felt shorter, I saw it originally in theaters and rewatched it a couple of days ago and when it ended I said to myself “wait that’s it?”. 28 Weeks Later is a 2007 post-apocalyptic horror film directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, who co-wrote it with Rowan Joff, Enrique Lpez Lavigne and Jesus Olmo. But it soon becomes all too clear that the scourge continues to live, waiting to. Six months later, a group of Americans dare to set foot on the isles, convinced the danger has come and gone. The payoff at the end of the sequel felt pretty weak, yes we got a conclusion on with don and his kids, but it felt somewhat unbelievable that he was able to track them down across the city. The inhabitants of the British Isles have lost their battle against the onslaught of disease, as the deadly rage virus has killed every citizen there. I feel like they overused the musical theme in the second one, whereas in the first, it was introduced in the finale in a very visceral and exciting manner. There was some decent character development in the second, with Renner, Don and his wife, but nothing really beats Jim’s arc in the first one. ![]() There was also a lot more variation in set pieces in the original. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but the original had a way of keeping you interested. Character introduction was staggered throughout the film, whereas in the original we are more or less introduced to everyone in the first quarter. ![]() ![]() I think the original had much better pacing and overall arc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |